Noticias de Hoy

MEXICO CITY – The Mexican government said Monday it is seeking changes in a U.S. plan to expand fences along the two nations‘ border because of the threat to migratory species accustomed to roaming freely across the frontier.

The Environment Department said the fences would seriously hurt species that cross the 1,952-mile border, and said the United States needs to alter or mitigate the barriers – aimed at stopping migrants from crossing illegally into the U.S. – where necessary.

Mexico also wants Washington to expand its environmental impact study on the fences and will file a complaint with the United Nations‘ International Court of Justice in the Hague, Netherlands if necessary.

“The eventual construction of this barrier would place at risk the various ecosystems that we share,” said Environment Secretary Juan Rafael Elvira, noting that the border is not just desert, but includes mountains, rivers and wetlands.

A report prepared for the Mexican government by experts and activists from both nations said the fences could isolate border animals into smaller population groups, affecting their genetic diversity.

Exequiel Ezcurra, director of research at the San Diego Natural History Museum, stressed that Mexico would not be the only loser from the construction of 700 miles of border fencing: the United States could lose visits from Mexican jaguars and black bears that have enriched U.S. ecosystems.

Environmentalists say highly endangered species like the antelope-like Sonoran Pronghorn — of which only about 100 still exist — could be wiped out in coming years, because they are used to moving across the border in search of scarce grassland.

The pronghorn “is without doubt the species in the most desperate situation, the number one victim of all the tension and movement on the border,” Ezcurra said.

Even strong lighting or radar could interfere with nocturnal species in border areas, and construction, maintenance and traffic along the walls would affect a wider strip of border land than just the fences themselves, the report states

Elvira did not say what alternatives to the fences might be, but the report suggested creating bridge areas so ecosystems can remain connected, and wilderness areas or “green corridors” without roads that experts say may be less attractive to smugglers.

It also suggested “live” fences of cactuses, non-permanent or removable fencing, night-vision instead of radar and more permeable fencing to allow water, insects and pollen to move across the border.

Original post by Tucson Citizen

Sponsored Links You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.